Narrative Opinion Summary
The plaintiff appeals a trial court order that imposed sanctions and mandated weekly payments for child support. The plaintiff argues that the court's assessment of her earning capacity lacked evidentiary support. However, the review of the record reveals sufficient evidence to justify the trial court's determination of her earning capacity. The appellate court affirms that it will not reexamine the factual findings. The ruling cites Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., reinforcing the decision. The appeal is denied, and the trial court's order is upheld.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review and Factual Findingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court asserts its role in refraining from reexamining factual findings made by the trial court.
Reasoning: The appellate court affirms that it will not reexamine the factual findings.
Assessment of Earning Capacitysubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court finds that the trial court's determination of the plaintiff's earning capacity is supported by sufficient evidence.
Reasoning: The plaintiff argues that the court's assessment of her earning capacity lacked evidentiary support. However, the review of the record reveals sufficient evidence to justify the trial court's determination of her earning capacity.
Precedent and Affirmation of Trial Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate decision cites precedent to support the affirmation of the trial court's ruling.
Reasoning: The ruling cites Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., reinforcing the decision.
Sanctions and Child Support Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The trial court's order imposing sanctions and mandating child support payments is upheld despite the plaintiff's challenge.
Reasoning: The plaintiff appeals a trial court order that imposed sanctions and mandated weekly payments for child support.