Narrative Opinion Summary
David A. Friedman appeals a judgment from the Appellate Court, which upheld the trial court's denial of his petition for admission to the Connecticut bar. The appeal was limited to the issue of whether the Connecticut bar examining committee's actions constituted a denial of due process. Upon reviewing the entire record, including briefs and oral arguments, the court concluded that the appeal should be dismissed because certification was improvidently granted. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Due Process in Bar Admissionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court examined whether the actions of the Connecticut bar examining committee in denying the petition for admission constituted a denial of due process.
Reasoning: The appeal was limited to the issue of whether the Connecticut bar examining committee's actions constituted a denial of due process.
Review of Certification Grantsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that the certification for the appeal was granted improvidently, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Reasoning: Upon reviewing the entire record, including briefs and oral arguments, the court concluded that the appeal should be dismissed because certification was improvidently granted.