Narrative Opinion Summary
Rehearing en banc has been ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of JELD-WEN, Inc. (formerly Grossman's Inc.) versus Gordon Van Brunt, who represents the estate of Mary Van Brunt. This decision was made sua sponte, meaning it was initiated by the court itself without a formal request from either party. The matter will be scheduled for submission at the Court's convenience. The order is signed by Chief Judge Anthony J. Scirica and dated April 27, 2010. Notable circuit judges involved include Scirica, Sloviter, McKee, and others. Relevant counsel have been copied on this order.
Legal Issues Addressed
Judicial Authority and Schedulingsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court will determine the timing for the rehearing en banc according to its schedule, reflecting the court's control over its docket and proceedings.
Reasoning: The matter will be scheduled for submission at the Court's convenience.
Rehearing En Bancsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has decided to rehear the case en banc, which involves the full panel of judges rather than the typical smaller panel, indicating the case's importance or complexity.
Reasoning: Rehearing en banc has been ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of JELD-WEN, Inc. (formerly Grossman's Inc.) versus Gordon Van Brunt, who represents the estate of Mary Van Brunt.
Sua Sponte Action by the Courtsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court has initiated the rehearing en banc on its own accord, without a petition from either party involved in the case, highlighting the court's proactive authority in matters it deems significant.
Reasoning: This decision was made sua sponte, meaning it was initiated by the court itself without a formal request from either party.