You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

People v. Jamieson

Citation: 2022 NY Slip Op 05101Docket: 2021-03146

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York; August 31, 2022; New York; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

Jose A. Jamieson was designated a level two sex offender following a hearing under the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) after pleading guilty to criminal sexual act in the second degree. The County Court assessed him 80 points for risk level classification. Jamieson appealed the decision, arguing that the prosecution failed to meet the burden of proof for the classification and that he was entitled to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level. The appellate court found that Jamieson did not preserve his objection regarding the burden of proof for appellate review, as he did not contest the assessment of points during the SORA hearing. Furthermore, the court ruled that his contention regarding a downward departure was also unpreserved and without merit, as he failed to identify any mitigating factors to justify such a departure. The appellate court affirmed the County Court's order, with no costs or disbursements awarded.

Legal Issues Addressed

Downward Departure in Risk Level Classification

Application: The appellate court ruled that Jamieson's contention for a downward departure was unpreserved and without merit due to his failure to identify mitigating factors.

Reasoning: Furthermore, the court ruled that his contention regarding a downward departure was also unpreserved and without merit, as he failed to identify any mitigating factors to justify such a departure.

Preservation of Objections for Appellate Review

Application: Jamieson did not preserve his objection regarding the burden of proof for appellate review because he did not contest the assessment of points during the SORA hearing.

Reasoning: The appellate court found that Jamieson did not preserve his objection regarding the burden of proof for appellate review, as he did not contest the assessment of points during the SORA hearing.

Sex Offender Risk Level Classification under SORA

Application: The County Court assessed Jose A. Jamieson 80 points for risk level classification following a hearing under SORA, resulting in his designation as a level two sex offender.

Reasoning: Jose A. Jamieson was designated a level two sex offender following a hearing under the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) after pleading guilty to criminal sexual act in the second degree. The County Court assessed him 80 points for risk level classification.