You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

THE KIDWELL GROUP, LLC d/b/a AIR QUALITY ASSESSORS OF FLORIDA a/a/o MARY GILBERT v. FEDNAT INSURANCE COMPANY

Citation: Not availableDocket: 21-3432

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; August 11, 2022; Florida; State Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the decision of the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County in the case of The Kidwell Group, LLC, d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida, as assignee of Mary Gilbert, against FedNat Insurance Company. The appeal was led by Chad A. Barr, representing the appellant, while Joshua S. Beck represented the appellee. The appellate court's decision was issued on August 11, 2022, and was made by a per curiam opinion with Judges Gross, Ciklin, and Kuntz concurring. The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Court Decision Affirmation

Application: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the appellee, indicating that the original ruling was upheld upon review.

Reasoning: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the decision of the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County in the case of The Kidwell Group, LLC, d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida, as assignee of Mary Gilbert, against FedNat Insurance Company.

Finality of Appellate Decisions

Application: The ruling is not considered final until any motions for rehearing are resolved, indicating that parties have the opportunity to seek reconsideration before the decision is finalized.

Reasoning: The ruling is not final until any timely filed motion for rehearing is resolved.

Per Curiam Opinion

Application: The decision was issued as a per curiam opinion, meaning it was delivered by the court collectively and unanimously without identifying any specific judge as the author.

Reasoning: The appellate court's decision was issued on August 11, 2022, and was made by a per curiam opinion with Judges Gross, Ciklin, and Kuntz concurring.