descrybe logo
You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Epiphany South Miami 602 A Enterprises, Inc. v. Waterhouse Construction Group, Inc.

Citations: 947 So. 2d 550; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21598Docket: No. 3D06-656

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; December 26, 2006; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The court affirmed the lower court's decision, referencing several precedential cases that support this outcome. Notable cases cited include Bonner v. RCC Associates, Inc. (679 So.2d 794), Concrete Design Structures, Inc. v. P.L. Dodge Foundation, Inc. (532 So.2d 1334), Coral 97 Associates Ltd. v. Chino Electric, Inc. (501 So.2d 69), Maguire v. King (917 So.2d 263), and Kaplan v. Kimball Hill Homes Florida, Inc. (915 So.2d 755), with the latter's review denied (929 So.2d 1053). Additionally, Ronbeck Construction Co. v. Savanna Club Corp. (592 So.2d 344) was also referenced, indicating a consistent legal principle across these cases.

Legal Issues Addressed

Citing Precedent in Judicial Opinions

Application: The court cited multiple cases to substantiate its decision, demonstrating the reliance on established precedent in reaching its judgment.

Reasoning: Notable cases cited include Bonner v. RCC Associates, Inc. (679 So.2d 794), Concrete Design Structures, Inc. v. P.L. Dodge Foundation, Inc. (532 So.2d 1334), Coral 97 Associates Ltd. v. Chino Electric, Inc. (501 So.2d 69), Maguire v. King (917 So.2d 263), and Kaplan v. Kimball Hill Homes Florida, Inc. (915 So.2d 755), with the latter's review denied (929 So.2d 1053).

Consistency in Legal Principles Across Cases

Application: The court highlighted the consistency of the legal principles applied in the cited cases, reinforcing the decision made in the current case.

Reasoning: Additionally, Ronbeck Construction Co. v. Savanna Club Corp. (592 So.2d 344) was also referenced, indicating a consistent legal principle across these cases.

Precedential Support for Affirmed Decisions

Application: The court affirmed the lower court's decision by referencing several precedential cases that provide consistent legal support for the outcome.

Reasoning: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, referencing several precedential cases that support this outcome.