You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Myers v. Sherwin-Williams Paint Co.

Citations: 898 So. 2d 264; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3577; 2005 WL 607913Docket: No. 1D04-2821

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; March 16, 2005; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves a dispute over the reimbursement of medical expenses between an employee and her employer's insurance carrier. The claimant, an employee, sought full reimbursement for psychotherapy treatment costs under Florida Statutes Section 440.13(2)(c), arguing that the employer failed to provide the necessary treatment. The employer/carrier contended that reimbursement should be limited to the fee schedule as mandated by Section 440.13(14)(b). The Judge of Compensation Claims ruled in favor of the employer/carrier, allowing reimbursement at the fee schedule rate, which the appellate court affirmed. Additionally, the JCC determined that the claimant was responsible for one-third of her past and future psychotherapy expenses. However, the appellate court found insufficient evidence to support this apportionment and reversed this part of the decision, remanding the matter for further proceedings. The court's final ruling was to affirm the reimbursement limitation, reverse the apportionment decision, and remand the case for additional consideration. The judgment reflects a nuanced interpretation of statutory requirements for medical expense reimbursement and apportionment under workers' compensation law.

Legal Issues Addressed

Apportionment of Medical Costs

Application: The court reverses the JCC's determination that the claimant should bear one-third of her psychotherapy costs due to insufficient evidence linking current treatment to previous issues.

Reasoning: The court finds insufficient evidence that her current treatment relates to the same issues as in the prior case.

Limitations on Fees for Medical Treatment under Florida Statutes Section 440.13(14)(b)

Application: Reimbursement for psychotherapy treatment is restricted to the adopted fee schedules, as the statute limits fees for remedial treatment.

Reasoning: However, this must be read with section 440.13(14)(b), which limits fees for remedial treatment to the adopted fee schedules.

Reimbursement for Medical Expenses under Florida Statutes Section 440.13(2)(c)

Application: The court affirms that reimbursement for medical expenses is limited to the applicable fee schedule if the employer fails to provide the required treatment.

Reasoning: The court agrees with the employer/carrier and affirms the JCC's order for reimbursement at the fee schedule.