You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Harrison v. Francisco ex rel. Harrison

Citations: 884 So. 2d 239; 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11672; 2004 WL 1751061Docket: No. 2D03-3836

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; August 6, 2004; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves an appeal by Richard Harrison against the trial court's denial of his motion for taxation of costs following the voluntary dismissal of a domestic violence injunction petition filed by his former wife, Shawn Francisco. Francisco's petition initially resulted in a temporary injunction but was voluntarily dismissed when she failed to present supporting evidence at the hearing. Harrison sought costs within thirty days of the dismissal, but the trial court denied his motion without a hearing. The appeal centered on the application of Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, specifically Rule 12.420, which incorporates Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420 regarding cost assessment after voluntary dismissals. The appellate court emphasized the necessity of an evidentiary hearing to assess the legitimacy of costs incurred by the opposing party, referencing precedent from Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision and remanded the case, instructing the trial court to conduct a proper hearing to evaluate Harrison's claimed costs. Judges Covington and Kelly concurred with this decision, underscoring the procedural requirement for a hearing in such circumstances.

Legal Issues Addressed

Requirement for Evidentiary Hearing on Motion for Costs

Application: The court mandates an evidentiary hearing to evaluate the costs claimed by the opposing party following a voluntary dismissal.

Reasoning: The court found that the trial court's decision to deny the motion for costs without a hearing was an error.

Voluntary Dismissal and Costs under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420

Application: The case demonstrates that upon voluntary dismissal, the trial court must assess the legitimacy of incurred costs through a hearing.

Reasoning: The appellate court highlights that when a party dismisses a case after the opposing party incurs costs, the trial court is required to hold a hearing to determine the legitimacy of those costs.