Narrative Opinion Summary
Gianna Sheinheit's appeal of a final judgment for damages and a permanent injunction has been reviewed. The order striking her pleadings is deemed supported by the record and falls within the discretion established in Mercer v. Raine. The court affirms the denial of her motion for disqualification, citing Fischer v. Knuck and Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law as authoritative precedents. The court also finds the denial of her motion for continuance to be within its discretion. Furthermore, the record substantiates the entry of the permanent injunction. The judgment is affirmed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Motion for Disqualificationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court upheld the denial of Sheinheit's motion for disqualification, referencing authoritative precedents to support its decision.
Reasoning: The court affirms the denial of her motion for disqualification, citing Fischer v. Knuck and Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law as authoritative precedents.
Discretionary Striking of Pleadingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court exercised its discretion in striking the pleadings of Gianna Sheinheit, supported by the record, in accordance with established precedents.
Reasoning: The order striking her pleadings is deemed supported by the record and falls within the discretion established in Mercer v. Raine.
Entry of Permanent Injunctionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The record provided adequate support for the entry of a permanent injunction against Sheinheit, affirming the lower court's judgment.
Reasoning: Furthermore, the record substantiates the entry of the permanent injunction. The judgment is affirmed.
Judicial Discretion in Denial of Continuancesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The denial of Sheinheit's motion for continuance was found to be a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
Reasoning: The court also finds the denial of her motion for continuance to be within its discretion.