Narrative Opinion Summary
In the case of In re Sav-A-Center, the defendant sought supervisory and/or remedial writs from the Civil District Court of Orleans, which had denied the relator's motion for an independent medical examination. The Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, reversed this judgment, agreeing with the dissenting opinion from the appellate court. The case has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Justices Kimball and Knoll expressed their dissent regarding the writ, indicating they would deny it.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Court Remandsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings following the appellate court's decision.
Reasoning: The case has been remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Dissenting Opinions on Writ Denialsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Kimball and Knoll dissented, indicating they would have denied the writ.
Reasoning: Justices Kimball and Knoll expressed their dissent regarding the writ, indicating they would deny it.
Independent Medical Examinationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The trial court's denial of the motion for an independent medical examination was reversed by the appellate court.
Reasoning: The Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, reversed this judgment, agreeing with the dissenting opinion from the appellate court.
Supervisory and Remedial Writssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The defendant sought supervisory and/or remedial writs to challenge the trial court's decision.
Reasoning: In the case of In re Sav-A-Center, the defendant sought supervisory and/or remedial writs from the Civil District Court of Orleans, which had denied the relator's motion for an independent medical examination.