Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward & Hamilton, & Scripps
Citations: 319 F.3d 1091; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1184; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1526; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2109; 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,303; 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1856Docket: 01-55321
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; February 6, 2003; Federal Appellate Court
The case involves the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) as the plaintiff-appellee against Luce, Forward, Hamilton, Scripps, the defendant-appellant. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered that the case be reheard en banc, meaning it will be reviewed by the full court rather than a three-judge panel. As a result, the opinion previously issued by the three-judge panel is not to be cited as precedent by any court within the Ninth Circuit unless it is adopted by the en banc court. Judge Fisher was recused from this decision. The case numbers are 00-57222 and 01-55321, and it was filed on February 7, 2003.