Narrative Opinion Summary
The appellant's petition for certiorari was dismissed due to untimeliness, resulting in a lack of jurisdiction. However, the dismissal is without prejudice, allowing the appellant the opportunity to seek relief at a lower court regarding issues faced in obtaining a copy of the order. This decision references the case Conklin v. Moore, 739 So.2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Judges Sawaya and Orfinger concur in the dismissal.
Legal Issues Addressed
Dismissal of Petition for Certiorari Due to Untimelinesssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court dismissed the appellant's petition due to it being filed beyond the permissible time frame.
Reasoning: The appellant's petition for certiorari was dismissed due to untimeliness, resulting in a lack of jurisdiction.
Dismissal Without Prejudicesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court's dismissal of the petition is without prejudice, meaning the appellant can pursue relief in a lower court.
Reasoning: However, the dismissal is without prejudice, allowing the appellant the opportunity to seek relief at a lower court regarding issues faced in obtaining a copy of the order.
Judicial Concurrence in Dismissalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Judges Sawaya and Orfinger agreed with the decision to dismiss the petition.
Reasoning: Judges Sawaya and Orfinger concur in the dismissal.