You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Miami-Dade County

Citations: 790 So. 2d 559; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10186; 2001 WL 818030Docket: No. 3D01-1682

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; July 20, 2001; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In a concurring opinion, Judge Cope addresses the denial of an administrative search warrant sought by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for its citrus canker inspection program. The trial court previously ruled that there was no statutory basis for issuing such warrants. Judge Cope expresses concern over the unresolved issue of statutory authority for future search warrants, noting the Department's potential need for them. He references a prior ruling that Miami-Dade County and the City of North Miami lacked standing to contest related agriculture statutes. Judge Cope interprets Florida Statutes Section 933.02(4)(c) as sufficiently broad to permit the issuance of search warrants and suggests that the authority for warrant issuance is implicit in the agriculture statute governing inspection activities (Section 581.031(15)(a)). This interpretation could influence future applications by the Department, underscoring the necessity of clarifying statutory provisions regarding search warrant authority within the context of agricultural inspections.

Legal Issues Addressed

Authority to Issue Search Warrants under Florida Statutes

Application: The court examines whether Florida Statutes allow the issuance of search warrants for the Department of Agriculture's citrus canker inspection program.

Reasoning: The court ruled that there was no statutory authority for issuing a search warrant related to the citrus canker inspection program.

Implied Authority under Agriculture Statutes

Application: Judge Cope argues that the power to obtain a search warrant is implicitly provided within the statute governing the Department's inspection activities.

Reasoning: Additionally, he contends that the authority to obtain a search warrant is implicitly included in the agriculture statute that governs the Department’s inspection program (Section 581.031(15)(a)).

Interpretation of Florida Statutes Section 933.02(4)(c)

Application: Judge Cope interprets the statute as broad enough to permit the issuance of a search warrant for the Department's inspection program.

Reasoning: Judge Cope believes that paragraph 933.02(4)(c) of the Florida Statutes (2000) is sufficiently broad to authorize the issuance of a search warrant upon the Department's application.

Standing to Challenge Agriculture Statutes

Application: The court previously determined that certain local governments lacked standing to challenge agricultural statutes associated with the citrus canker program.

Reasoning: The court's prior ruling that Miami-Dade County and the City of North Miami lacked standing to challenge the agriculture statutes relevant to the citrus canker program.