You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Alter v. Florida Pools of Central Florida, Inc.

Citations: 758 So. 2d 1262; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6773Docket: No. 5D99-1168

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; June 1, 2000; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves Florida Pools of Central Florida, Inc., which initially prevailed in an appeal affirmed by a per curiam decision. Concurrently, Florida Pools filed a motion for attorney fees based on a contractual provision, but the motion was misfiled and not considered during the appeal. After the mandate was issued and the court term concluded, Florida Pools submitted a duplicate motion for attorney fees, which was denied due to the expired term. The denial was recognized as erroneous, leading the court to grant a rehearing to address the oversight. The court, referencing Judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit v. Janovitz, confirmed its jurisdiction to assess appellate attorney fees since the original motion was timely filed. Consequently, the rehearing resulted in the approval of the motion for appellate attorney fees, with the decision supported by the Chief Judge Antoon and Judge Dauksh. The case underscores the importance of addressing procedural missteps and confirms jurisdictional authority in awarding attorney fees post-mandate issuance.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Attorney Fees and Jurisdiction

Application: The court maintained its jurisdiction to assess appellate attorney fees, as a timely motion had been filed despite procedural errors.

Reasoning: Citing Judges of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit v. Janovitz, the court affirmed its jurisdiction to assess appellate attorney fees given that a timely motion had been filed.

Misfiled Motions and Judicial Oversight

Application: The initial oversight in addressing the motion for attorney fees occurred due to the misfiling, which led to its absence from the court file reviewed by the panel.

Reasoning: Florida Pools had filed a motion on August 23 seeking attorney fees based on a contractual provision; however, this motion was misfiled, leading to its absence from the court file reviewed by the panel.

Rehearing for Correction of Judicial Errors

Application: The court granted a rehearing to rectify the error of denying the attorney fees motion due to the expired term, acknowledging that the initial denial was erroneous.

Reasoning: This denial was deemed erroneous, prompting the court to grant rehearing to rectify the oversight.