Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Lindsay Earls and Lacey Earls, Minors, by Their Next Friends and Parents, John David Earls and Lori Earls Daniel James, a Minor, by His Friend and Mother, Leta Hagar v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District, Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County Tecumseh Public School District, Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma State School Boards Association National School Boards Association Washington Legal Foundation U.S. Senators Judd Gregg and Don Nickles Governor Frank Keating Rep. Fred S. Morgan (Oklahoma) Oklahoma Secondary Schools Activities Association Allied Educational Foundation Gayla D. Duke Rhonda Ellard Debra Fletcher Bobbette Hamilton Jimmy and Sheila Jordan Michael and Kim Rawls Stewart and Roshel Stabel Kenneth A. Stanley Kris Steele Clyde L. And Gail A. Topping Mike and Valerie Tucker Steve and Lynne Young the American Public Health Association the National Association of Social Workers the National Association of Social Workers-Oklahom
Citations: 300 F.3d 1222; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17693Docket: 00-6128
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; August 26, 2002; Federal Appellate Court
Lindsay and Lacey Earls, along with Daniel James, minors represented by their parents, appealed against the Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District and related entities. The case, which reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, was remanded from the Supreme Court following its decision in *Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls*. The Tenth Circuit vacated its previous opinion and mandated that the district court grant summary judgment in favor of the Board of Education and the School District. The court's decision reflects a reversal of the earlier ruling, aligning with the Supreme Court's guidance. The judgment emphasized the legal principles outlined in the Supreme Court's opinion, ultimately leading to a conclusion favorable to the defendants. The case involved numerous amici curiae, including various educational and health organizations, who submitted briefs supporting the defendants' position. The decision was rendered per curiam by Circuit Judges Brorby, Anderson, and Ebel.