You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Haynes v. State

Citations: 747 So. 2d 458; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16952; 1999 WL 1241907Docket: No. 98-837

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; December 20, 1999; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The appeal by Lisa Haynes contests the summary denial of her rule 3.850 motion. The court reverses the denial and remands the case for further proceedings. Haynes asserts that she would not have pleaded guilty if she had been aware of the court's intention to impose a habitual offender sentence. The absence of a notice of intent to seek such sentencing or any record demonstrating her agreement to it leaves her claim unrefuted. The trial court is instructed to either conduct an evidentiary hearing on the matter or attach parts of the record that conclusively refute Haynes' claim. The decision is supported by Judges JOANOS, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, who concur.

Legal Issues Addressed

Notice Requirement for Habitual Offender Sentence

Application: Haynes' claim that she was unaware of the habitual offender sentence was unrefuted due to the absence of a prior notice of intent or record agreement, necessitating further examination of her plea.

Reasoning: Haynes asserts that she would not have pleaded guilty if she had been aware of the court's intention to impose a habitual offender sentence. The absence of a notice of intent to seek such sentencing or any record demonstrating her agreement to it leaves her claim unrefuted.

Requirement for Evidentiary Hearing

Application: The trial court is required to conduct an evidentiary hearing or provide conclusive record evidence if it seeks to deny Haynes' motion without further proceedings.

Reasoning: The trial court is instructed to either conduct an evidentiary hearing on the matter or attach parts of the record that conclusively refute Haynes' claim.

Summary Denial of Rule 3.850 Motion

Application: The appellate court reversed the trial court's summary denial of Haynes' motion, indicating that the trial court must provide grounds for such denial if it is to stand.

Reasoning: The court reverses the denial and remands the case for further proceedings.