Narrative Opinion Summary
The Unemployment Appeals Commission's order disqualifying the appellant from receiving benefits has been reversed. The Commission's finding that the appellant voluntarily left her job lacks substantial competent evidence. The hearing transcript indicates evidence supporting the appellant's case. The decision is reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to grant all benefits to the appellant without additional conditions.
Legal Issues Addressed
Evidence Supporting Claimant's Positionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The hearing transcript provided evidence that supported the appellant's case, contradicting the Commission's finding.
Reasoning: The hearing transcript indicates evidence supporting the appellant's case.
Remand with Instructions to Grant Benefitssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case was remanded with instructions to grant all unemployment benefits to the appellant without imposing additional conditions.
Reasoning: The decision is reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to grant all benefits to the appellant without additional conditions.
Requirement of Substantial Competent Evidencesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court found that there was a lack of substantial competent evidence to support the Commission's finding that the appellant voluntarily left her job.
Reasoning: The Commission's finding that the appellant voluntarily left her job lacks substantial competent evidence.
Reversal of Unemployment Benefits Disqualificationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court reversed the Unemployment Appeals Commission's order that disqualified the appellant from receiving unemployment benefits due to insufficient evidence supporting voluntary job termination.
Reasoning: The Unemployment Appeals Commission's order disqualifying the appellant from receiving benefits has been reversed.