You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

BUC International Corp. v. International Yacht Council Ltd.

Citations: 489 F.3d 1129; 83 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1129; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14713; 2007 WL 1774643Docket: 04-13653

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; June 21, 2007; Federal Appellate Court

Original Court Document: View Document

Narrative Opinion Summary

The case involves BUC International Corp. (BUC) suing International Yacht Council Limited (IYC) and MLS Solutions, Inc. for copyright infringement over a yacht listings database. BUC claimed copyright protection for the selection, order, and arrangement of information in its BUCNET database. The defendants argued against the validity of BUC's copyright and contended that the jury should have been instructed to apply a 'virtually identical' standard rather than 'substantial similarity' for copyright infringement. The district court found in favor of BUC, issuing a permanent injunction against IYC and MLS Solutions, and awarded BUC actual and statutory damages. The defendants appealed, challenging the jury instructions and the originality of the copyright. The Eleventh Circuit upheld the district court's decision, affirming the use of the 'substantial similarity' standard based on established legal precedent. The court found no error in the jury instructions or the district court's declaratory judgment favoring BUC, thus maintaining the original ruling and the awarded damages.

Legal Issues Addressed

Copyright Protection for Factual Compilations

Application: The court affirmed that BUC's selection, order, and arrangement of yacht listing information were protectable under copyright law.

Reasoning: The jury confirmed BUC's ownership of valid copyrights and found IYC and MLS liable for infringement, while exonerating Pazos.

Declaratory Judgment and Validity of Copyrights

Application: The district court's declaratory judgment in favor of BUC on the defendants’ counterclaims was affirmed, based on the jury's findings.

Reasoning: The district court was bound by the jury's determination that BUC owned valid copyrights, and the judgment was affirmed in all respects.

Jury Instructions in Copyright Cases

Application: The appellate court found no error in the district court's jury instructions regarding the standard for evaluating copyright infringement.

Reasoning: The court rejected the defense's objection and maintained the original instructions.

Originality Requirement for Copyright

Application: BUC successfully demonstrated the originality of its compilation, selection, and arrangement of yacht listings, which were deemed protectable.

Reasoning: BUC supported its originality claim through testimonies from Sullivan and Joseph Marino... emphasizing the disarray of vessel listings prior to BUCNET and the originality of BUC's selection and arrangement.

Standard for Proving Copyright Infringement

Application: The Eleventh Circuit upheld the use of the 'substantial similarity' standard for determining copyright infringement in the context of factual compilations.

Reasoning: The court correctly submitted to the jury the 'substantial similarity' standard, which is the proper standard for analyzing compilation copyright claims.