You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Merrick Construction Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Environmental Quality

Citations: 700 So. 2d 236; 97 La.App. 1 Cir. 0110; 1997 La. App. LEXIS 2347Docket: No. 97 CA 0110, 96 CW 2322

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; September 19, 1997; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate case, Merrick Construction Company, Inc. contested a trial court decision that dismissed its claims against the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and transferred the case due to improper venue. Merrick, an unsuccessful bidder on a contract for waste tire remediation awarded to Gibson Recycling, sought to void the contract and a mobile processor authorization certificate issued to Gibson by the DEQ. The trial court ruled against Merrick, stating that Merrick failed to follow the statutory process to challenge DEQ regulations under Louisiana Revised Statute 49:963. The appellate court upheld this decision, emphasizing that Merrick’s challenge was inherently tied to its objections to DEQ’s regulations, which allowed a mobile processor to operate without a standard permit. Additionally, the court confirmed the trial court's decision to transfer the venue to the Fourth Judicial District Court in accordance with La. R.S. 13:5104(B), which requires lawsuits against political subdivisions to be filed in the district where the subdivision is located or where the cause arises. Thus, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, denying Merrick's writ with costs assessed to Merrick.

Legal Issues Addressed

Challenge to Agency Regulations

Application: The court found that Merrick Construction Company did not follow the statutory procedure required to challenge the validity of DEQ regulations, as outlined in La. R.S. 49:963.

Reasoning: Since Merrick did not follow the proper statutory procedure to challenge these regulations as outlined in La. R.S. 49:963, the trial court correctly granted DEQ’s exception.

Definition of Political Subdivision

Application: The court determined that the Ouachita Parish Police Jury qualifies as a political subdivision under La. R.S. 13:5102, affecting the decision on proper venue for the lawsuit.

Reasoning: The definition of 'political subdivision' under La. R.S. 13:5102 includes various local governance entities, such as parishes and municipalities, confirming that a police jury qualifies as a political subdivision.

Improper Venue and Transfer of Cases

Application: The court upheld the transfer of the case to the Fourth Judicial District Court based on the declinatory exception of improper venue, pursuant to La. R.S. 13:5104(B), which dictates that lawsuits against political subdivisions must be filed where the subdivision is located or where the cause arises.

Reasoning: Regarding venue, the court affirmed the trial court's decision to transfer the case, citing La. R.S. 13:5104(B), which mandates that lawsuits against political subdivisions be filed in the district court where the subdivision is located or where the cause arises.