You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Crockett v. Atlanta Life Insurance

Citations: 695 So. 2d 531; 96 La.App. 4 Cir. 2200; 1997 La. App. LEXIS 1461; 1997 WL 269526Docket: No. 96-CA-2200

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; May 21, 1997; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the appellant, Atlanta Life Insurance Co., challenges a trial court ruling that awarded the appellee, Emmett J. Crockett, $20,000 in permanent and total disability benefits under an insurance policy. Crockett, a bus driver, was injured in an automobile accident and subsequently retired without immediately notifying the insurer. His initial claim was denied by Atlanta due to a purported failure to meet the policy's one-year notification requirement following disability onset. However, upon official declaration of his disability by a physician, Crockett resubmitted his claim, which was again denied. The trial court found in favor of Crockett, awarding him benefits under the policy while denying penalties and attorney fees. Atlanta's appeal asserted the denial was justified based on Crockett's age at the time of disability and the timing of notification. The appellate court amended the trial court's judgment, affirming Crockett's entitlement to benefits under Section II of the policy, based on the determination that his disability onset occurred after age sixty but before sixty-five, entitling him to payments until the month before his 65th birthday. The decision underscores the importance of precise interpretation of insurance policy provisions and adherence to procedural requirements in disability claims.

Legal Issues Addressed

Denial of Benefits Based on Filing Timeframe

Application: Atlanta's denial was based on Mr. Crockett's failure to provide timely proof of disability, but the court found this argument insufficient given the circumstances.

Reasoning: Atlanta denied Crockett’s claim, citing a one-year filing limit for disability claims after the incident.

Eligibility for Benefits Under Section II

Application: Mr. Crockett was found eligible for benefits under Section II due to the timing of his disability onset and notification, entitling him to payments until shortly before his 65th birthday.

Reasoning: He will receive monthly payments of $363.80 starting August 24, 1994, until the month before his 65th birthday, September 21, 1998.

Insurance Policy Interpretation

Application: The court interpreted the insurance policy provisions to determine eligibility for disability benefits, focusing on the timing of disability onset and notification requirements.

Reasoning: The $20,000 life insurance policy issued by Atlanta to Mr. Crockett includes provisions for 'Permanent Total Disability Benefits.' These provisions state that if an insured individual, before age 60, becomes totally disabled and provides proof of such disability within one year, they are entitled to 60 monthly installments at a rate of $18.19 per $1,000 of insurance.

Timing of Disability Onset and Notification

Application: The court evaluated the timing of Mr. Crockett’s disability onset and his notification to the insurance company, concluding that despite Atlanta's claims, he met the policy’s requirements.

Reasoning: His disability onset occurred after age sixty but before age sixty-five, making him eligible for benefits under the policy.