Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Pike v. Petro-Chem Operating, Co.
Citations: 685 So. 2d 150; 1997 La. LEXIS 89; 1997 WL 11196Docket: No. 97-CC-0018
Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana; January 9, 1997; Louisiana; State Supreme Court
Petro-Chem Operating Co. Inc. and various defendants, including Mitchell, Lane, Hock, Larry F., Hock, Bruce, Hock, Ralph, Anderson, Gertrude Feazel, Anderson, Henry Feazel, Anderson, William Garnett, Wall, Lallage Feazel, Hugh-Rawls Corp., Hughes, Dudley, and Rawls, James, sought supervisory and/or remedial writs from the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, concerning a decision from the 1st Judicial District, Parish of Caddo, case No. 383,422. The application for writs was denied. Justice Marcus indicated a willingness to grant the writ, while Chief Justice Calogero was not part of the panel reviewing the case.