Narrative Opinion Summary
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied by the court. The denial does not imply endorsement of the language, rationale, or legal principles articulated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. The case referenced is Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). The decision to deny the writ is concurred by Chief Justice Hooper and Justices Almon, Houston, Kennedy, Cook, and Butts, while Justice Maddox dissents.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Writ of Certiorarisubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, indicating that the higher court will not review the decision of the lower court.
Reasoning: The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied by the court.
Implications of Denial of Certiorarisubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The denial does not reflect the higher court's agreement with the lower court's opinion or reasoning.
Reasoning: The denial does not imply endorsement of the language, rationale, or legal principles articulated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals.
Judicial Concurrence and Dissentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: A majority of the justices concurred with the decision to deny the writ, while one justice dissented.
Reasoning: The decision to deny the writ is concurred by Chief Justice Hooper and Justices Almon, Houston, Kennedy, Cook, and Butts, while Justice Maddox dissents.