Narrative Opinion Summary
SADCO, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion to intervene in a residential foreclosure case. The trial court's decision was based on the precedent set in Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, which establishes that a purchaser of property under a lis pendens related to a bank's foreclosure cannot intervene in that action. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Denial of Interventionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reviewed and affirmed the trial court's denial of SADCO, Inc.'s motion to intervene, indicating the lower court's adherence to established legal precedent.
Reasoning: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling.
Intervention in Foreclosure Actionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court applied the precedent that a purchaser of property subject to a lis pendens related to a bank's foreclosure is not permitted to intervene in the foreclosure action.
Reasoning: The trial court's decision was based on the precedent set in Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat’l Bank, which establishes that a purchaser of property under a lis pendens related to a bank's foreclosure cannot intervene in that action.