You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Lastra v. Crabill

Citations: 672 So. 2d 902; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4748; 1996 WL 230737Docket: Nos. 95-1008, 95-2537

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; May 8, 1996; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Two cases were consolidated for appellate review. In case no. 95-1008, Dr. John M. Crabill appeals an adverse summary judgment, contending that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment due to the presence of material factual disputes concerning his status as a third-party beneficiary of a contract made by Dr. Idalia Lastra. The appellate court agrees with Dr. Crabill regarding these disputed issues and reverses the summary judgment, remanding the case for further proceedings. In case no. 95-2537, where Dr. Idalia Lastra is the appellant, the court finds no merit in her arguments and affirms the trial court's judgment.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review of Trial Court Judgments

Application: The appellate court reviewed and found no merit in Dr. Idalia Lastra's arguments, thereby affirming the trial court's judgment.

Reasoning: In case no. 95-2537, where Dr. Idalia Lastra is the appellant, the court finds no merit in her arguments and affirms the trial court's judgment.

Summary Judgment Standards

Application: The appellate court found that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment due to the existence of material factual disputes concerning Dr. John M. Crabill's status as a third-party beneficiary.

Reasoning: The appellate court agrees with Dr. Crabill regarding these disputed issues and reverses the summary judgment, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Third-Party Beneficiary Rights

Application: Dr. John M. Crabill's appeal contended that there were material factual disputes about his status as a third-party beneficiary, which the appellate court recognized as grounds to reverse the summary judgment.

Reasoning: Dr. John M. Crabill appeals an adverse summary judgment, contending that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment due to the presence of material factual disputes concerning his status as a third-party beneficiary of a contract made by Dr. Idalia Lastra.