Narrative Opinion Summary
Vazquez International, Inc. and Jose Vazquez Gonzalez appeal a final judgment following a bench trial, which was determined to be adverse to them. The appellate court finds that the trial court's judgment is substantiated by substantial competent evidence and complies with applicable law. The court concludes that the final judgment against both appellants is appropriate under the circumstances of the case, referencing precedents Mannish v. Lacayo and Nessim v. DeLoache for support. The judgment is affirmed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Trial Court Judgmentssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court affirms the trial court's judgment against Vazquez International, Inc. and Jose Vazquez Gonzalez, determining it to be appropriate under the circumstances.
Reasoning: The court concludes that the final judgment against both appellants is appropriate under the circumstances of the case, referencing precedents Mannish v. Lacayo and Nessim v. DeLoache for support.
Standard of Review for Bench Trial Judgmentssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court applies the standard of reviewing whether the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial competent evidence and complies with applicable law.
Reasoning: The appellate court finds that the trial court's judgment is substantiated by substantial competent evidence and complies with applicable law.