Thanks for visiting! Welcome to a new way to research case law. You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation and good law / bad law checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.
Craven v. State
Citations: 624 So. 2d 866; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317; 1993 WL 405176Docket: No. 92-1381
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; October 12, 1993; Florida; State Appellate Court
The appellant in this case challenges his judgment and sentence for the manufacture of cannabis, possession of over 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel during the trial. He asserts that his case qualifies for an exception to the general rule requiring such claims to be raised in a post-conviction relief motion. The court disagrees with the appellant's position and affirms the judgment, allowing him the opportunity to address the ineffectiveness of trial counsel through the appropriate post-conviction relief process. Judges Ervin, Joanos, and Wolf concur with the decision.