You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Sanders v. State

Citation: 263 So. 3d 288Docket: Case No. 5D18-1133

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; February 7, 2019; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate decision, the court reviews the case of an appellant challenging his judgment and sentence for probation violations. The appellant was previously sentenced to 180 months for Attempted First-Degree Premeditated Murder and Possession of a Firearm by a Delinquent. The primary legal issue concerns the erroneous finding of violating a probation condition prohibiting association with known criminals, based on inadequate evidence from a drug test. The State concedes this point, and the appellate court agrees, identifying the error as fundamental. Nonetheless, the court determines that the trial court's decision to revoke probation and impose the sentence would have occurred regardless of this error. The appellate court affirms the trial court's judgment and sentence but remands the case to correct the record by removing the unsupported probation violation. This decision was concurred by Judges Berger, Wallis, and Eisnaugle, highlighting the appellate court's role in ensuring accurate legal findings while maintaining the original sentencing outcome.

Legal Issues Addressed

Fundamental Error in Probation Violation Finding

Application: The appellate court acknowledges a fundamental error in the trial court's finding of a violation regarding association with criminals, as it was unsupported by the evidence.

Reasoning: The State concedes, and the court agrees, that evidence from a positive drug test does not substantiate this violation, categorizing the error as fundamental.

Probation Violation and Sentencing

Application: The court affirms the trial court's judgment and sentence despite an error in the finding of a probation violation, determining the sentence would remain unchanged.

Reasoning: Despite this, the court concludes that the trial court would have revoked Sanders' probation and imposed the same sentence even without the erroneous finding.

Remand for Correction of Judgment

Application: The case is remanded to correct the record by eliminating the erroneous probation violation finding.

Reasoning: Therefore, while affirming the judgment and sentence, the court remands the case with instructions to eliminate the finding of violation of condition six.