Narrative Opinion Summary
The Florida Supreme Court quashed the prior decision in this case and remanded it for reconsideration based on the ruling in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 257 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2018). Following this directive, the court reversed the trial court's dismissal order and remanded the case for a merits determination regarding Dyck-O'Neal's deficiency claim. The decision was concurred by Chief Justice B.L. Thomas and Justices Lewis and Makar.
Legal Issues Addressed
Reconsideration of Case Based on Higher Court Rulingsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Florida Supreme Court directed the reconsideration of the case based on its prior ruling in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, necessitating a reassessment of the trial court's decision.
Reasoning: The Florida Supreme Court quashed the prior decision in this case and remanded it for reconsideration based on the ruling in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 257 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2018).
Reversal of Trial Court's Dismissal Ordersubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court reversed the trial court's order dismissing the case, indicating that the case should proceed to a determination on the merits.
Reasoning: Following this directive, the court reversed the trial court's dismissal order and remanded the case for a merits determination regarding Dyck-O'Neal's deficiency claim.