You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Landry v. Joey's, Inc.

Citation: 261 So. 3d 112Docket: 18-441

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal; December 11, 2018; Louisiana; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this case, the plaintiff, Terese Landry, appealed the trial court's summary judgment favoring Joey's Inc., asserting that a shrimp po-boy sandwich she consumed from their establishment caused her severe food poisoning. The trial court dismissed her claims, finding insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the food was deleterious or that it caused her illness. Landry experienced symptoms the day after consuming the sandwich, but her medical diagnosis identified a Campylobacter infection unrelated to seafood, as the bacterium is typically found in poultry, swine, and cattle. She argued that her testimony and hospital reports of similar cases established a material fact issue. However, the court noted the lack of evidence directly linking the sandwich to her illness and the absence of corroborating medical testimony. The appellate court reviewed the summary judgment de novo, affirming the trial court's decision. It concluded that Landry failed to meet the burden of proof required to show the food's deleterious condition and causation by a preponderance of the evidence, as mandated under Louisiana law. Her claims were dismissed with prejudice, and costs of the appeal were assigned to her.

Legal Issues Addressed

Causation in Food Poisoning Cases

Application: Under Louisiana law, a plaintiff in a food poisoning case must prove that the food was deleterious at the time of purchase and establish a causal link between the food and the resulting illness.

Reasoning: Under Louisiana law, a plaintiff in a food poisoning case must prove that the food was deleterious at the time of purchase and establish a causal link between the food and the resulting illness.

Evidence Requirements for Causation

Application: The plaintiff must show that it is more likely than not that the food caused the injury and that medical opinion linking the illness to the specific food is essential.

Reasoning: While a plaintiff is not required to negate all possible causes, they must show that it is more likely than not that the food caused the injury. Additionally, medical opinion linking the illness to the specific food is essential...

Role of Testimony in Establishing Causation

Application: The plaintiff's testimony alone was insufficient to establish causation and create a genuine issue of material fact.

Reasoning: Ms. Landry's argument that her testimony about two other food poisoning cases creates a genuine issue of material fact regarding her own illness is unsubstantiated.

Sufficient Evidence for Food's Deleterious Condition

Application: Plaintiffs must demonstrate that they consumed the suspect food and that no other food could reasonably account for their illness within a relevant timeframe.

Reasoning: Successful recovery in food-related illness cases typically requires plaintiffs to demonstrate that they consumed the suspect food and that no other food could reasonably account for their illness within a relevant timeframe.

Summary Judgment Review and Burden of Proof

Application: The appellate court reviews summary judgment grants de novo, assessing whether a genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reasoning: The appellate court reviews summary judgment grants de novo, assessing whether a genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.