Narrative Opinion Summary
Plaintiffs in the case of In re Pichon, David, applied for a writ of certiorari and/or review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, concerning the judgment from the Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court. The Court of Appeal's decision (No. 92CA-1517) was reversed, with the court determining that the trial judge was not clearly wrong. Consequently, the judgment of the trial court (No. 90-15299) was reinstated. Justices Lemmon and Hall expressed a desire to grant and docket the writ, while Chief Justice Calogero was not part of the panel.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Trial Court Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court of Appeal's decision was reversed, indicating that the appellate court found no clear error in the trial court's judgment.
Reasoning: The Court of Appeal's decision (No. 92CA-1517) was reversed, with the court determining that the trial judge was not clearly wrong.
Judicial Panel Participationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Justices Lemmon and Hall expressed a desire to grant and docket the writ, while Chief Justice Calogero was not part of the panel deciding the case.
Reasoning: Justices Lemmon and Hall expressed a desire to grant and docket the writ, while Chief Justice Calogero was not part of the panel.
Reinstatement of Trial Court Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: After reversing the Court of Appeal's decision, the judgment of the trial court was reinstated.
Reasoning: Consequently, the judgment of the trial court (No. 90-15299) was reinstated.
Writ of Certiorari and/or Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The plaintiffs applied for a writ of certiorari and/or review to challenge the Court of Appeal's decision.
Reasoning: Plaintiffs in the case of In re Pichon, David, applied for a writ of certiorari and/or review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, concerning the judgment from the Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court.