You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

EEZZZZ-ON Trailers, Inc. v. Bankers Insurance Co.

Citations: 619 So. 2d 470; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6246Docket: No. 92-03806

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; June 9, 1993; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

An appeal was made regarding the trial court’s denial of attorney's fees to EEZZZZ-ON’s attorney after Bankers, the appellee, sought a declaration that EEZZZZ-ON was not covered under its liability insurance for an accident. EEZZZZ-ON defended the lawsuit, which Bankers later voluntarily dismissed after paying the full policy limits. The trial court awarded EEZZZZ-ON attorney's fees for services up to that point. The primary issue addressed was whether the attorney was entitled to fees for litigating the attorney's fees issue. Citing precedent, the court held that an attorney cannot recover fees for time spent on attorney's fees litigation when the client, as the prevailing party, has no interest in the fee. This led to the affirmation of the trial court's decision. The ruling noted a conflict with decisions from other district courts regarding this issue. Judges Frank, Parker, and Senior Judge Scheb concurred.

Legal Issues Addressed

Attorney's Fees in Insurance Litigation

Application: The court addressed whether an attorney is entitled to fees for litigating the attorney's fees issue when the client has no interest in the fee, and concluded that such fees are not recoverable.

Reasoning: Citing precedent, the court held that an attorney cannot recover fees for time spent on attorney's fees litigation when the client, as the prevailing party, has no interest in the fee.

Judicial Precedent and Conflicting Decisions

Application: The ruling acknowledged a conflict with decisions from other district courts regarding the recoverability of attorney's fees for litigating fees, yet the decision was affirmed based on existing precedent.

Reasoning: The ruling noted a conflict with decisions from other district courts regarding this issue.

Voluntary Dismissal and Attorney's Fees

Application: The trial court awarded attorney's fees to EEZZZZ-ON for services rendered up to the point of the voluntary dismissal by Bankers after they paid the full policy limits.

Reasoning: The trial court awarded EEZZZZ-ON attorney's fees for services up to that point.