You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Kahn v. Gill Hotels Co.

Citations: 610 So. 2d 1374; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13031; 1992 WL 385613Docket: No. 92-2371

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; December 29, 1992; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

The appellate court reviewed a trial court's non-final order that granted a change of venue from Palm Beach County to Broward County. The appellants contested the venue change, arguing that the appellee did not provide adequate justification. The court examined the requirements for changing venue as outlined in its precedent, Florida Forms, Inc. v. Barkett Computer Services, Inc., and under Chapter 47 of the Florida Statutes. It found that the appellee failed to demonstrate either that Palm Beach County was an improper venue or to present valid reasons for the change, as required by law. The court noted that the effects of the alleged tortious conduct occurred in Palm Beach County, supporting the appellants' position. Moreover, the appellee's motion lacked reference to relevant statutory provisions, and the trial court did not make necessary findings under Chapter 47. Consequently, the appellate court determined that the trial court erred in granting the venue change. The order was reversed, and the case was remanded to be reinstated in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County.

Legal Issues Addressed

Burden of Proof in Venue Challenges

Application: The appellate court found that the appellee did not satisfy the burden of proof to show that the venue in Palm Beach County was improper, thus the burden did not shift to the appellants.

Reasoning: The appellee failed to present evidence to prove that venue was improper there. Thus, the burden did not shift to the appellants to prove otherwise.

Change of Venue Requirements

Application: The appellate court applied the principle that a defendant must demonstrate the original venue is improper or provide valid reasons under Chapter 47 of the Florida Statutes for a venue change.

Reasoning: The court referenced its prior ruling in Florida Forms, Inc. v. Barkett Computer Services, Inc., which requires a defendant seeking a venue change to demonstrate either that the chosen venue does not lie or that there are valid reasons under Chapter 47 of the Florida Statutes for the change.

Trial Court's Error in Venue Findings

Application: The appellate court identified an error in the trial court's decision due to the absence of necessary findings under Chapter 47 of the Florida Statutes when granting the change of venue.

Reasoning: The appellee's motion to transfer venue did not cite any relevant sections of Chapter 47, and the trial court did not make necessary findings under those sections.