Narrative Opinion Summary
The prior judgment in favor of Alabama One Credit Union and William A. Lunsford has been reversed by the court following a remand from the Alabama Supreme Court in the case Ex parte Price, 244 So.3d 949 (Ala. 2017). The case is sent back to the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court for proceedings that align with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion. Judges Thompson, Pittman, Thomas, and Moore concur with this decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Concurrence of Judgessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision to reverse and remand the case is concurred by Judges Thompson, Pittman, Thomas, and Moore.
Reasoning: Judges Thompson, Pittman, Thomas, and Moore concur with this decision.
Remand for Further Proceedingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case is remanded to the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court for proceedings that are consistent with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion.
Reasoning: The case is sent back to the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court for proceedings that align with the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion.
Reversal of Judgmentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court has reversed the prior judgment in favor of Alabama One Credit Union and William A. Lunsford.
Reasoning: The prior judgment in favor of Alabama One Credit Union and William A. Lunsford has been reversed by the court following a remand from the Alabama Supreme Court in the case Ex parte Price, 244 So.3d 949 (Ala. 2017).