Narrative Opinion Summary
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, based on the reasons outlined in the related case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 602 So.2d 731 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992). Costs incurred during the appeal and at the trial level are assigned to Randy Matthews and James Nugent, while the costs related to the remand proceedings are assigned to the City of Alexandria. The final disposition is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and rendered.
Legal Issues Addressed
Allocation of Costs on Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court assigns the costs incurred during the appeal and at the trial level to Randy Matthews and James Nugent.
Reasoning: Costs incurred during the appeal and at the trial level are assigned to Randy Matthews and James Nugent.
Allocation of Costs on Remandsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The costs related to the remand proceedings are assigned to the City of Alexandria.
Reasoning: The costs related to the remand proceedings are assigned to the City of Alexandria.
Judgment Affirmation and Reversalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, aligning with the reasons from the related case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria.
Reasoning: The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, based on the reasons outlined in the related case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 602 So.2d 731 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992).