Housman v. Housman

Docket: Nos. 90-2037, 90-2412

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 17, 1991; Florida; State Appellate Court

EnglishEspañolSimplified EnglishEspañol Fácil
The court affirms the decision in the matter presented, referencing several precedential cases that support the ruling. The cited cases include:

- Tietig v. Boggs, 578 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Allen v. Allen, 569 So.2d 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Mettler v. Mettler, 569 So.2d 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Kuse v. Kuse, 533 So.2d 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Ibanez v. Salazar, 459 So.2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 467 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 1985)
- Lewis v. Lewis, 450 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 248451 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1984)
- O’Brien v. O’Brien, 407 So.2d 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- Ashburn v. Ashburn, 350 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)

Each cited case contributes to the legal rationale supporting the affirmation.