Narrative Opinion Summary
Sufficient evidence exists in the record, allowing reasonable inferences that warrant submission of the appellant's case to a jury for factual determination. Citing precedents from *Brown v. Sims* and *Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc.*, the court finds that the trial court erred in granting the appellee’s Motion for Directed Verdict. The decision is reversed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Motion for Directed Verdictsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court found that the trial court erred in granting the appellee’s Motion for Directed Verdict, necessitating a reversal of the decision.
Reasoning: The court finds that the trial court erred in granting the appellee’s Motion for Directed Verdict. The decision is reversed.
Sufficiency of Evidencesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined that sufficient evidence was present to justify submitting the appellant's case to a jury for factual determination.
Reasoning: Sufficient evidence exists in the record, allowing reasonable inferences that warrant submission of the appellant's case to a jury for factual determination.