Narrative Opinion Summary
The state has appealed a trial court order that granted the appellee's motion to suppress evidence. The appellate court has reversed this order and remanded the case for the trial court to reconsider the suppression issue, taking into account recent Supreme Court decisions in *Florida v. Jimeno* and *Florida v. Bostick*. Judges Stone and Farmer concur with the decision, while Judge Garrett concurs in part and dissents in part, offering a separate opinion.
Legal Issues Addressed
Appellate Review of Suppression Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The appellate court has authority to review and reverse a trial court's order granting a motion to suppress evidence.
Reasoning: The appellate court has reversed this order and remanded the case for the trial court to reconsider the suppression issue.
Consideration of Supreme Court Precedentssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The trial court is instructed to reconsider its decision on the suppression of evidence in light of recent Supreme Court rulings.
Reasoning: The appellate court has reversed this order and remanded the case for the trial court to reconsider the suppression issue, taking into account recent Supreme Court decisions in *Florida v. Jimeno* and *Florida v. Bostick*.
Judicial Concurrence and Partial Dissentsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Judges may concur with a decision in part while dissenting in part, sometimes providing a separate opinion to express their views.
Reasoning: Judges Stone and Farmer concur with the decision, while Judge Garrett concurs in part and dissents in part, offering a separate opinion.