Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal is dismissed based on the precedent set in Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The court emphasizes that it lacks jurisdiction to review an order that dismisses a complaint unless that order explicitly includes the necessary language indicating finality of the dismissal. Judges WARNER, POLEN, and Associate Judge SHAHOOD concur with this decision.
Legal Issues Addressed
Jurisdiction for Appeal of Dismissal Orderssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court determined it lacks jurisdiction to review a dismissal order unless the order contains explicit language indicating it is final.
Reasoning: The court emphasizes that it lacks jurisdiction to review an order that dismisses a complaint unless that order explicitly includes the necessary language indicating finality of the dismissal.
Precedent in Appellate Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision to dismiss the appeal was based on the precedent established in a prior case, Russell v. Russell.
Reasoning: The appeal is dismissed based on the precedent set in Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).