Narrative Opinion Summary
Alfred Landry, the relator, has applied for a writ of mandamus concerning the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Division E, case number 239-450. He alleges that the district court has not acted in a timely manner regarding a motion he submitted to correct an illegal sentence, purportedly filed on or around September 27, 1989. If the relator's assertion is accurate, the court is mandated to review and take action on the motion.
Legal Issues Addressed
Court's Duty to Act on Filed Motionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: If the relator's claim of filing the motion on or around September 27, 1989, is true, the district court is obligated to review and address the motion.
Reasoning: If the relator's assertion is accurate, the court is mandated to review and take action on the motion.
Mandamus Relief for Untimely Court Actionsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The relator seeks a writ of mandamus due to the district court's alleged failure to act on his motion to correct an illegal sentence in a timely manner.
Reasoning: Alfred Landry, the relator, has applied for a writ of mandamus concerning the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Division E, case number 239-450.