Narrative Opinion Summary
A rehearing en banc has been granted in the case of United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., following a request by a member of the Court. A majority of active judges voted in favor of this rehearing, resulting in the vacating of the previous panel's opinion issued on September 2, 2003. The case originated from the Southern District of Georgia and is filed under docket number 01-00028-CR. The decision was made by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on February 3, 2004, with a panel of Circuit Judges participating in the ruling.
Legal Issues Addressed
Grant of Rehearing En Bancsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The Court granted a rehearing en banc after a majority of active judges voted in favor, which resulted in vacating the previous panel's opinion.
Reasoning: A rehearing en banc has been granted in the case of United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., following a request by a member of the Court. A majority of active judges voted in favor of this rehearing, resulting in the vacating of the previous panel's opinion issued on September 2, 2003.
Jurisdiction and Procedural Posturesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case originated from the Southern District of Georgia and was reviewed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, indicating the procedural posture and jurisdiction of the appeal.
Reasoning: The case originated from the Southern District of Georgia and is filed under docket number 01-00028-CR.
Role of Circuit Judges in Rehearingsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision to rehear the case en banc was made with the participation of a panel of Circuit Judges, demonstrating their role in appellate review.
Reasoning: The decision was made by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on February 3, 2004, with a panel of Circuit Judges participating in the ruling.