You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

James v. State

Citations: 555 So. 2d 246; 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 627; 1988 WL 127145Docket: 6 Div. 753

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama; September 20, 1988; Alabama; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Jeremiah James appeals the denial of his petition for relief under Rule 20.1 of the Alabama Temporary Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was denied by the Circuit Court of Jefferson County on April 29, 1988, without an evidentiary hearing. James claims he was coerced into pleading guilty to first-degree forgery on November 30, 1979, and was not informed about the potential range of punishment or the nature of the charges at the time of the plea. He further asserts he received inadequate legal representation, including not being advised of his right to appeal. The State of Alabama has filed a motion to remand the case for further proceedings. The court agrees with the motion, remanding the case to the circuit court with instructions to appoint counsel for James and conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding his claims. Following the hearing, a proper return shall be filed with the court. All judges concur with this decision.

Legal Issues Addressed

Remand Procedure Following Denial of Relief Without Hearing

Application: When a post-conviction relief petition is denied without an evidentiary hearing, the case must be remanded for further proceedings and a proper return to the appellate court.

Reasoning: The court agrees with the motion, remanding the case to the circuit court with instructions to appoint counsel for James and conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding his claims. Following the hearing, a proper return shall be filed with the court.

Requirement to Appoint Counsel in Post-Conviction Proceedings

Application: The appellate court instructed the circuit court to appoint counsel to represent Jeremiah James during the evidentiary hearing on his Rule 20.1 petition.

Reasoning: The court agrees with the motion, remanding the case to the circuit court with instructions to appoint counsel for James and conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding his claims.

Right to Evidentiary Hearing on Post-Conviction Relief Petition

Application: The court held that Jeremiah James is entitled to an evidentiary hearing regarding his claims of coercion and inadequate legal representation in his plea.

Reasoning: James claims he was coerced into pleading guilty to first-degree forgery on November 30, 1979, and was not informed about the potential range of punishment or the nature of the charges at the time of the plea. He further asserts he received inadequate legal representation, including not being advised of his right to appeal.