Narrative Opinion Summary
The appeal is dismissed because the order under review grants summary judgment but does not constitute a final judgment. Cited precedents include Shupack v. Allstate Ins. Co., Bailey v. Allstate Ins. Co., and Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, which affirm the dismissive stance on non-final judgments. Additionally, references to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and McCready v. Villas Apartments support the decision regarding the appeal's viability.
Legal Issues Addressed
Application of Florida Rules of Civil Proceduresubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: References to procedural rules were used to support the decision regarding the non-appealability of the order.
Reasoning: Additionally, references to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and McCready v. Villas Apartments support the decision regarding the appeal's viability.
Finality of Judgments for Appealsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court dismissed the appeal because the order granting summary judgment is not a final judgment, and thus not appealable.
Reasoning: The appeal is dismissed because the order under review grants summary judgment but does not constitute a final judgment.
Precedent on Non-Final Judgmentssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The decision to dismiss the appeal is supported by precedents which consistently affirm the non-appealability of non-final judgments.
Reasoning: Cited precedents include Shupack v. Allstate Ins. Co., Bailey v. Allstate Ins. Co., and Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, which affirm the dismissive stance on non-final judgments.