Narrative Opinion Summary
Genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the appellee's reasonable care and timeliness in executing a reinvestment program for trust assets, as claimed by the appellant. The cases cited, Banfield v. Addington and Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., support this determination. Consequently, the summary judgment being reviewed is reversed.
Legal Issues Addressed
Genuine Issues of Material Factsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The case involved disputes over the appellee's reasonable care and timeliness in executing a reinvestment program, which constituted genuine issues of material fact.
Reasoning: Genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the appellee's reasonable care and timeliness in executing a reinvestment program for trust assets, as claimed by the appellant.
Precedent Support for Reversalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court referenced precedent cases that support the determination of reversing the summary judgment.
Reasoning: The cases cited, Banfield v. Addington and Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., support this determination.
Summary Judgment Reversalsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court found that there were genuine issues of material fact that warranted the reversal of the summary judgment.
Reasoning: Consequently, the summary judgment being reviewed is reversed.