You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

City of Clearwater v. Mills Development Group of Florida, Inc.

Citations: 536 So. 2d 1138; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 154; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5655; 1988 WL 137208Docket: No. 87-1207

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; December 22, 1988; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

This case involves a contractual dispute between a municipality and property owners concerning a beach renourishment project. The City of Clearwater contracted with property owners to deposit sand from Clearwater Inlet to restore beach areas. After four years of alleged noncompliance, the owners sued the City, seeking a specific slope construction and damages for failure to achieve it. The trial court ruled in favor of the owners, interpreting the contract to include a 'natural slope' as referenced in a public notice and by sound construction practices, though the contract itself was silent on slope specifications. The court ordered the City to either complete the sand deposition as intended or pay $801,000 in damages if permits were not obtainable. The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision, agreeing that the judgment was supported by competent, substantial evidence and did not present significant legal questions. The decision underscores the importance of evidentiary support in determining contractual intent and the remedies available for breach of contract.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review Standards

Application: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, noting the absence of significant legal questions and the presence of competent, substantial evidence.

Reasoning: Upon reviewing the case, the appellate court found no significant legal questions and affirmed the trial court's judgment, which was backed by competent, substantial evidence.

Contract Interpretation and Intent

Application: In this case, the court interpreted the contract to include a natural slope requirement based on external references and sound construction practices.

Reasoning: The court ruled in favor of the property owners, determining that while the contract did not specify the slope, a natural slope referenced in a public notice from October 29, 1979, was the intended outcome.

Evidence Supporting Contractual Intent

Application: The court relied on the City's drawings submitted to the Department of Natural Resources to support the conclusion that a natural slope was intended.

Reasoning: The court also noted that the City's submitted drawings to the Department of Natural Resources indicated a natural slope, supporting the conclusion that this was the contractual intent.

Remedies for Breach of Contract

Application: The court ordered the City to either fulfill its contractual obligations or pay damages to the property owners.

Reasoning: The City was ordered to deposit sand at designated beach locations, or if unable to secure necessary permits, pay the owners $801,000 in damages.