You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Robert L. Malone v. Walter T. Redavid, John W. Holsten, Francis R. Alberti, Darlene J. Redavid, John C. Holsten, Joanne H. Holsten, American Land Transfer Associates, Pennsylvania Title Insurance Co., Jjw Management, Inc., T/d/b/a Jjw Management Inc. Pension Trust, Joseph P. Caranci, Jr., Redavid & Caranci

Citations: 176 F.3d 472; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3261; 1999 WL 88769Docket: 98-1375

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; January 25, 1999; Federal Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

Robert L. Malone filed an appeal against Walter T. Redavid and several other defendants, including individuals and corporate entities such as American Land Transfer Associates and Pennsylvania Title Insurance Co. The case originated in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was subsequently remanded. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reviewed the appeal and affirmed the lower court's decision. The appeal was numbered 98-1375 and was decided on January 26, 1999, following a prior ruling referenced as 118 F.3d 1576.

Legal Issues Addressed

Appellate Review by United States Court of Appeals

Application: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit conducted a review of the appeal filed by Robert L. Malone against multiple defendants, affirming the decision of the lower court.

Reasoning: The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reviewed the appeal and affirmed the lower court's decision.

Case Remand and Subsequent Proceedings

Application: The case was initially heard in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was subsequently remanded before reaching the appellate stage.

Reasoning: The case originated in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was subsequently remanded.

Identification of Appellate Case Number and Decision Date

Application: The appeal, identified by case number 98-1375, was concluded with a decision on January 26, 1999.

Reasoning: The appeal was numbered 98-1375 and was decided on January 26, 1999.