Narrative Opinion Summary
The court affirmed the decisions in multiple cited cases, including Vaughn v. Smith, Hobbs Construction and Development, Inc. v. Presbyterian Homes of Synod of Florida, W.N. Robbins Electric, Inc. v. Intercontinental Group, Inc., Jaquin-Florida Distilling Company v. Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Architects-Engineers-Planners, Incorporated, and Palmer v. Thomas. The references to these cases indicate precedent relevant to the current matter. Additionally, the summary includes pertinent statutory references: Sections 713.06(2)(a) and 713.31(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (1981), as well as Section 1.260(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. These statutes and rules likely relate to the legal principles under consideration in the affirmed cases.
Legal Issues Addressed
Application of Florida Statutory Lawsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Sections 713.06(2)(a) and 713.31(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes are referenced as statutory grounds for the legal principles under examination in the affirmed cases.
Reasoning: Additionally, the summary includes pertinent statutory references: Sections 713.06(2)(a) and 713.31(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (1981).
Precedent and Affirmation of Prior Decisionssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court relies on the affirmation of decisions in multiple cited cases to uphold the legal principles relevant to the current matter.
Reasoning: The court affirmed the decisions in multiple cited cases, including Vaughn v. Smith, Hobbs Construction and Development, Inc. v. Presbyterian Homes of Synod of Florida, W.N. Robbins Electric, Inc. v. Intercontinental Group, Inc., Jaquin-Florida Distilling Company v. Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Architects-Engineers-Planners, Incorporated, and Palmer v. Thomas.
Procedural Rules in Civil Casessubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Section 1.260(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure is cited in the context of procedural rules applicable to the cases under review.
Reasoning: These statutes and rules likely relate to the legal principles under consideration in the affirmed cases.