Narrative Opinion Summary
In the matter of In re LaRue, Robert; LaRue, Myra D., a group of petitioners, including Tramonte, Dragon, Clark, Glass, Singleton, and Hornsby, applied for a writ of certiorari and/or review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, concerning case No. CA86 0195 from the Parish of St. Helena, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. C, case No. 10878. The prior report on this case is documented as La.App. 512 So.2d 862. The application for the writ was ultimately denied. However, Chief Justice Dixon expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating a willingness to grant the writ.
Legal Issues Addressed
Denial of Writ Applicationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court ultimately denied the application for the writ of certiorari and/or review.
Reasoning: The application for the writ was ultimately denied.
Dissenting Opinion in Writ Denialsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: Chief Justice Dixon dissented, indicating a differing opinion by expressing a willingness to grant the writ.
Reasoning: Chief Justice Dixon expressed a dissenting opinion, indicating a willingness to grant the writ.
Writ of Certiorari and/or Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The petitioners sought judicial review through a writ of certiorari to challenge the decision of the Court of Appeal, First Circuit.
Reasoning: A group of petitioners, including Tramonte, Dragon, Clark, Glass, Singleton, and Hornsby, applied for a writ of certiorari and/or review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit.