You are viewing a free summary from Descrybe.ai. For citation checking, legal issue analysis, and other advanced tools, explore our Legal Research Toolkit — not free, but close.

Fitterman v. Fitterman

Citations: 502 So. 2d 8; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 203; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9577Docket: No. 85-1920

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida; September 3, 1986; Florida; State Appellate Court

Narrative Opinion Summary

In this appellate case, the court addresses an appeal concerning two non-final orders from a lower court in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. The parties were married for a brief period but had cohabitated intermittently for three years. The husband, who is financially stable, was allowed to remain in the marital home under the condition that he provide comparable housing for the wife and pay her $3,000 monthly for rent and temporary support. The wife challenged the adequacy of this temporary alimony, arguing that it did not reflect their standard of living during the marriage. The court noted that the determination of temporary alimony should consider factors such as the couple's standard of living, the wife's needs, and the husband's ability to pay, as established in Belcher v. Belcher. Furthermore, the wife contested the lower court's award of temporary attorney's fees, asserting that the amount awarded was insufficient based on expert testimony. The appellate court found that the award of $4,000 in attorney's fees constituted an abuse of discretion and reversed the decision, remanding the matter for reevaluation. The trial court was instructed to reassess both the temporary alimony and attorney's fees, ensuring that its conclusions are supported by articulated findings of fact.

Legal Issues Addressed

Abuse of Discretion in Awarding Attorney’s Fees

Application: The appellate court found that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding temporary attorney’s fees of $4,000 despite expert testimony suggesting a reasonable fee of $16,000.

Reasoning: The court's reliance on this testimony, while not binding, suggests that the $4,000 awarded was an abuse of discretion.

Rehearing and Withdrawal of Previous Opinion

Application: The appellate court granted a petition for rehearing, resulting in the withdrawal of the previous opinion dated June 11, 1986.

Reasoning: Appellant's petition for rehearing is granted, leading to the withdrawal of the previous opinion dated June 11, 1986.

Reversal and Remand for Reevaluation

Application: The appellate court reversed the trial court's award of attorney's fees and remanded for reevaluation, instructing the trial court to reconsider temporary alimony with sufficient findings of fact.

Reasoning: Consequently, the order for attorney's fees is reversed and remanded for reevaluation. The trial court is instructed to reconsider the evidence regarding temporary alimony in light of the factors outlined in Belcher and to provide sufficient findings of fact to justify its conclusions.

Temporary Alimony Determination under Belcher v. Belcher

Application: The court's determination of temporary alimony must consider the standard of living during the marriage, the wife's needs, and the husband's ability to pay, as established in Belcher v. Belcher.

Reasoning: The appropriate factors for determining temporary alimony include the standard of living during the marriage, the wife's needs, and the husband's ability to pay, as established in Belcher v. Belcher, 271 So.2d 7 (Fla.1972).