Narrative Opinion Summary
The court affirms the decision in Conklin v. Hurley, 428 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1983). It certifies a question of significant public interest to the Florida Supreme Court: whether implied warranties of fitness and merchantability apply to first purchasers of commercial real estate from developers. The ruling is affirmed with concurrence from Judges Cobb, Orfinger, and Sharp.
Legal Issues Addressed
Affirmation of Lower Court Rulingssubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court upholds the decision in the case of Conklin v. Hurley, affirming the ruling of the lower court.
Reasoning: The court affirms the decision in Conklin v. Hurley, 428 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1983).
Certification of Question of Public Interestsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court certifies a question to the Florida Supreme Court due to its significant public interest.
Reasoning: It certifies a question of significant public interest to the Florida Supreme Court: whether implied warranties of fitness and merchantability apply to first purchasers of commercial real estate from developers.
Implied Warranties in Commercial Real Estatesubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court addresses whether implied warranties of fitness and merchantability extend to first purchasers of commercial real estate from developers.
Reasoning: It certifies a question of significant public interest to the Florida Supreme Court: whether implied warranties of fitness and merchantability apply to first purchasers of commercial real estate from developers.