Narrative Opinion Summary
The court addressed a petition for a writ of common law certiorari regarding the trial court's order for the discovery of documents from external researchers provided to Procter & Gamble Company. The court referenced Procter & Gamble v. Swilley, 462 So.2d 1188 (1985), which supported the trial court's decision to allow the discovery of such research documents. Consequently, the petition for writ of certiorari was denied, with Chief Judge E.R. Evin and Judges L. Smith and Nimmons concurring.
Legal Issues Addressed
Discovery of Documents in Civil Litigationsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court upheld the trial court's decision to allow the discovery of documents from external researchers provided to Procter & Gamble, indicating that such documents are discoverable in the context of civil litigation.
Reasoning: The court addressed a petition for a writ of common law certiorari regarding the trial court's order for the discovery of documents from external researchers provided to Procter & Gamble Company.
Writ of Certiorari in Appellate Reviewsubscribe to see similar legal issues
Application: The court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, affirming the lower court's decision and demonstrating the limited scope of appellate review via certiorari in this context.
Reasoning: Consequently, the petition for writ of certiorari was denied, with Chief Judge E.R. Evin and Judges L. Smith and Nimmons concurring.